Skip to main content

US IVF Success Rates by Age (2026)

Cumulative live birth rates per intended egg retrieval, patients using their own eggs, across 452 reporting fertility clinics and 433,836 cycles. Source: CDC NASS ART Summary, 2022 reporting year.

US Fertility comparison

Compare IVF costs, funding and clinic data

Check package costs, public funding notes, clinic routes and success-rate context before shortlisting providers.

Quick answer

Updated May 2026

US IVF costs are usually made up of clinic cycle fees, medication, add-ons, storage and insurance coverage differences. Service pages help identify clinics, but affordability depends on state, coverage and expected cycles.

  • Estimate more than one cycle when comparing total cost.
  • Check state insurance rules and whether the clinic offers the needed service.
  • Compare base cycle cost, medication cost and add-on assumptions separately.

Sources and updates

How this page is sourced

Updated May 2026

Sources

  • CDC ART clinic data
  • Published fertility clinic information
  • State insurance mandate information
  • TreatCompare compiled US IVF affordability dataset

Methodology: We compare publicly available clinic service data, published cost assumptions and TreatCompare affordability modelling. Actual patient costs can vary by clinic, medication protocol, insurance plan and number of cycles.

Caveat: This page is for cost comparison and planning. It is not medical advice or financial advice.

Important context

IVF success rates vary by age, diagnosis, treatment type, use of donor eggs, embryo transfer approach and patient selection. TreatCompare summarises published clinic-level data for comparison and research purposes only. It is not medical advice and should not be used as the sole basis for choosing a clinic. Patients should verify current figures, treatment suitability and pricing directly with the clinic.

Source type
Official public dataset
Primary source
CDC clinic-level fertility reporting
Reporting period
2022 ART reporting year, latest compiled TreatCompare view
Last updated
May 2026
Figure type
Official public dataset
Use
Research and comparison only

Are you a clinic, provider or data owner?

If you believe information on this page is inaccurate, out of date, incomplete or presented without necessary context, contact us with the page URL and supporting evidence. We review correction requests promptly, but they are not automatically accepted.

CDC methodology notes

TreatCompare uses the latest available CDC clinic-level fertility reporting and groups results by patient age band. The table below is cycle-weighted, so larger reporting clinics have more influence on national and state averages. Clinic-level success rates are not a simple quality ranking: age, diagnosis, donor-egg use, embryo-transfer approach, reporting choices and patient mix can materially change the number shown.

Data year

CDC ART 2022

Last updated

May 2026

Use

Research and comparison

US IVF next steps

Use success rates with real cost and access checks

US IVF decisions usually move between five questions: realistic out-of-pocket cost, state insurance coverage, clinic access, success rates and payment options. These links keep that route visible from every high-intent US page.

Use success rates with cost and clinic data

Move from headline IVF prices to total cost, clinic outcomes, state rules and payment options.

National average — cycle-weighted

Patient ageLive birth rate per intended retrieval
Under 3548.3%
35–3735.0%
38–4022.7%
Over 408.3%

Weighted by each clinic’s reported cycle volume — larger clinics count more. This is the cumulative success rate metric CDC publishes for patient-facing comparison.

By state

Sorted by under-35 weighted average. Click a state to see clinics ranked by cycle volume.

StateClinicsCycles<3535–3738–40>40
North Dakota149369.1%47.4%0.0%0.0%
New Hampshire148865.5%47.1%30.4%0.0%
Idaho11,14361.7%39.5%21.4%13.3%
South Carolina44,14259.6%44.0%33.8%10.8%
North Carolina119,00459.5%46.0%31.1%12.7%
New Jersey1420,80956.2%42.1%28.8%10.7%
Minnesota56,17355.5%40.2%23.7%8.3%
Utah45,90455.4%40.4%26.0%12.1%
Nevada63,12155.2%34.9%24.1%7.0%
Oregon44,17154.5%42.8%31.3%13.1%
Maine181153.9%40.7%36.9%12.5%
Texas4433,82553.2%37.3%24.2%9.6%
Iowa22,28253.0%43.0%26.7%13.1%
Maryland518,31352.9%38.3%23.7%7.9%
Hawaii52,03352.9%41.3%21.4%7.0%
Georgia109,92652.7%36.3%24.2%9.2%
Delaware21,59052.5%41.5%23.3%6.2%
Massachusetts817,60952.2%39.5%27.1%10.0%
Pennsylvania1111,93652.2%40.7%24.2%8.7%
Arizona106,76851.9%35.8%24.8%9.5%
Ohio109,86951.7%37.7%25.1%8.5%
Mississippi389051.6%33.6%8.6%0.0%
Louisiana43,00451.4%29.8%21.1%8.5%
Washington1210,08251.0%37.4%26.9%10.7%
Wisconsin62,72050.8%34.0%19.7%3.6%
Tennessee74,67550.6%36.5%27.2%8.3%
Kansas53,22450.5%35.7%19.2%6.0%
Vermont277250.0%25.3%12.4%4.3%
Virginia117,64549.9%34.8%24.0%7.0%
Michigan87,14549.6%33.1%21.2%5.1%
Kentucky41,18449.3%36.7%14.8%0.0%
Alabama52,29449.2%25.1%17.4%2.1%
Montana150749.1%37.2%24.2%0.0%
Nebraska22,00248.7%30.0%14.7%5.1%
Indiana74,48447.9%31.4%21.4%5.9%
Connecticut78,11846.7%34.7%23.7%7.2%
Illinois2122,69446.6%33.0%19.8%6.3%
Florida2618,79744.3%34.8%19.1%7.5%
Rhode Island199144.2%40.8%24.6%9.8%
California8571,44543.7%32.9%22.7%9.4%
Colorado811,37343.3%31.1%18.9%7.7%
Missouri96,87143.2%26.9%17.0%6.4%
Arkansas129343.1%28.6%11.5%0.0%
New York4467,86941.1%29.1%19.0%6.8%
New Mexico277140.2%29.1%21.2%1.4%
Oklahoma398940.1%28.8%17.0%4.6%
District of Columbia21,04339.6%33.6%19.2%5.0%
South Dakota164038.5%32.2%11.1%0.0%
West Virginia241737.5%25.2%0.0%0.0%
Alaska1550.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%

How to read these numbers

The CDC reports several success-rate metrics; the one shown here is “percentage of intended egg retrievals resulting in live-birth deliveries” — the cumulative metric that follows a patient through any frozen transfers from the same retrieval. It is the most clinically meaningful comparison metric.

Live birth rates fall sharply with patient age. The drop between 35–37 and 38–40 is generally larger than the drop between under-35 and 35–37, reflecting reduced ovarian reserve and increased aneuploidy.

State averages vary because of clinic mix (academic vs commercial), patient demographics, and self-selection (lower-success patients may travel to higher-success clinics). Use state averages directionally, not as a clinic-quality ranking.