IVF in Rhode Island vs Massachusetts
Which state offers better fertility treatment access?
Rhode Island
- Insurance mandate
- Partial mandate
- Coverage quality score
- 0.55
- Est. total cost to baby
- $50,800
- Est. out-of-pocket
- $35,560
- Affordability ratio
- 43.4%
- Affordability band
- Strained
- Clinic count
- 1
- Clinics per 1M population
- 0.91
- Median household income
- $81,854
- Access gap score
- 0.507
Massachusetts
- Insurance mandate
- Full mandate
- Coverage quality score
- 0.90
- Est. total cost to baby
- $61,020
- Est. out-of-pocket
- $21,357
- Affordability ratio
- 22.1%
- Affordability band
- Very affordable
- Clinic count
- 8
- Clinics per 1M population
- 1.14
- Median household income
- $96,505
- Access gap score
- 0.244
At a glance, Massachusetts offers better IVF access (gap score 0.244 vs 0.507) due to stronger insurance coverage, lower estimated out-of-pocket costs, higher clinic density, and a more favourable affordability ratio.
Access gap score: 0 = best access, 1 = worst. Combines affordability (40%), insurance coverage strength (30%), and clinic density (30%).