IVF in Illinois vs Florida
Which state offers better fertility treatment access?
Illinois
- Insurance mandate
- Full mandate
- Coverage quality score
- 0.90
- Est. total cost to baby
- $45,788
- Est. out-of-pocket
- $16,026
- Affordability ratio
- 20.4%
- Affordability band
- Very affordable
- Clinic count
- 21
- Clinics per 1M population
- 1.67
- Median household income
- $78,433
- Access gap score
- 0.166
Florida
- Insurance mandate
- No mandate
- Coverage quality score
- 0.00
- Est. total cost to baby
- $48,784
- Est. out-of-pocket
- $48,784
- Affordability ratio
- 71.8%
- Affordability band
- Severely strained
- Clinic count
- 26
- Clinics per 1M population
- 1.15
- Median household income
- $67,917
- Access gap score
- 0.707
At a glance, Illinois offers better IVF access (gap score 0.166 vs 0.707) due to stronger insurance coverage, lower estimated out-of-pocket costs, higher clinic density, and a more favourable affordability ratio.
Access gap score: 0 = best access, 1 = worst. Combines affordability (40%), insurance coverage strength (30%), and clinic density (30%).