IVF in Colorado vs Utah
Which state offers better fertility treatment access?
Colorado
- Insurance mandate
- Full mandate
- Coverage quality score
- 0.90
- Est. total cost to baby
- $49,428
- Est. out-of-pocket
- $17,300
- Affordability ratio
- 19.7%
- Affordability band
- Very affordable
- Clinic count
- 8
- Clinics per 1M population
- 1.36
- Median household income
- $87,598
- Access gap score
- 0.193
Utah
- Insurance mandate
- Partial mandate
- Coverage quality score
- 0.55
- Est. total cost to baby
- $47,860
- Est. out-of-pocket
- $33,502
- Affordability ratio
- 38.6%
- Affordability band
- Affordable
- Clinic count
- 4
- Clinics per 1M population
- 1.17
- Median household income
- $86,833
- Access gap score
- 0.403
At a glance, Colorado offers better IVF access (gap score 0.193 vs 0.403) due to stronger insurance coverage, lower estimated out-of-pocket costs, higher clinic density, and a more favourable affordability ratio.
Access gap score: 0 = best access, 1 = worst. Combines affordability (40%), insurance coverage strength (30%), and clinic density (30%).