IVF in Ohio vs Michigan
Which state offers better fertility treatment access?
Ohio
- Insurance mandate
- Diagnosis only
- Coverage quality score
- 0.10
- Est. total cost to baby
- $46,264
- Est. out-of-pocket
- $46,264
- Affordability ratio
- 69.1%
- Affordability band
- Severely strained
- Clinic count
- 10
- Clinics per 1M population
- 0.85
- Median household income
- $66,990
- Access gap score
- 0.786
Michigan
- Insurance mandate
- No mandate
- Coverage quality score
- 0.00
- Est. total cost to baby
- $45,368
- Est. out-of-pocket
- $45,368
- Affordability ratio
- 66.2%
- Affordability band
- Severely strained
- Clinic count
- 8
- Clinics per 1M population
- 0.80
- Median household income
- $68,505
- Access gap score
- 0.817
At a glance, Ohio offers better IVF access (gap score 0.786 vs 0.817) due to stronger insurance coverage, and higher clinic density.
Access gap score: 0 = best access, 1 = worst. Combines affordability (40%), insurance coverage strength (30%), and clinic density (30%).