IVF in Connecticut vs Pennsylvania
Which state offers better fertility treatment access?
Connecticut
- Insurance mandate
- Partial mandate
- Coverage quality score
- 0.55
- Est. total cost to baby
- $51,668
- Est. out-of-pocket
- $36,168
- Affordability ratio
- 40.1%
- Affordability band
- Strained
- Clinic count
- 7
- Clinics per 1M population
- 1.94
- Median household income
- $90,213
- Access gap score
- 0.331
Pennsylvania
- Insurance mandate
- No mandate
- Coverage quality score
- 0.00
- Est. total cost to baby
- $46,768
- Est. out-of-pocket
- $46,768
- Affordability ratio
- 63.9%
- Affordability band
- Severely strained
- Clinic count
- 11
- Clinics per 1M population
- 0.85
- Median household income
- $73,170
- Access gap score
- 0.790
At a glance, Connecticut offers better IVF access (gap score 0.331 vs 0.790) due to stronger insurance coverage, lower estimated out-of-pocket costs, higher clinic density, and a more favourable affordability ratio.
Access gap score: 0 = best access, 1 = worst. Combines affordability (40%), insurance coverage strength (30%), and clinic density (30%).