Skip to main content

UT Health San Antonio Reproductive Health and Fertility Center

San Antonio, TX

Medical director: Belinda J. Yauger, MD

Using this data?

Methodology, extracts and licensing

Updated May 2026

Main sources

  • CDC ART clinic reporting
  • Published clinic website information where available
  • TreatCompare US fertility clinic dataset

Methodology: Clinic profiles show reported outcome data, cycle volume, public pricing where available and source caveats. TreatCompare does not add fake ratings or infer undisclosed fees.

TreatCompare publishes healthcare, care-cost and treatment-pricing research for consumers, journalists, policymakers and commercial teams.

Contact TreatCompare about dataMethodology, source summaries and structured extracts: TreatCompare data team

Important context

IVF success rates vary by age, diagnosis, treatment type, use of donor eggs, embryo transfer approach and patient selection. TreatCompare summarises published clinic-level data for comparison and research purposes only. It is not medical advice and should not be used as the sole basis for choosing a clinic. Patients should verify current figures, treatment suitability and pricing directly with the clinic.

Source type
Official public dataset and provider-published information
Primary source
CDC ART clinic reporting
Reporting period
2022 reporting year
Last updated
May 2026
Figure type
Mixed sources
Use
Research and comparison only

Are you a clinic, provider or data owner?

If you believe information on this page is inaccurate, out of date, incomplete or presented without necessary context, contact us with the page URL and supporting evidence. We review correction requests promptly, but they are not automatically accepted.

Outcomes — CDC ART 2022

468 total ART cycles reported.

Patient ageLive birth rate per intended retrievalEstimated retrievals to live birth
Under 3551.1%~2
35–3732.8%~3
38–4023.7%~4.2
Over 4017.1%~5.8

Cumulative success rate for patients using their own eggs (with or without prior ART cycles). Estimated retrievals = 1 / live birth rate (independence assumption — real-world outcomes vary with embryo banking and protocol changes). Source: CDC NASS ART Summary (2022).

Clinic information

Address
Medical Arts & Research Center, 8300 Floyd Curl Dr, 5th Floor, San Antonio 78229
Phone
(210) 450-9500
CDC Clinic ID
169
Status
Open

Source: CDC National ART Surveillance System (NASS) Final ART Summary 2022.

Published pricing

UT Health San Antonio Reproductive Health and Fertility Center does not publish itemized IVF pricing on its public website. Pricing is typically disclosed by a financial counselor after consultation. Typical US clinic range: $14,000–$30,000 per cycle plus medication.The clinic's FAQ page acknowledges a 'bundle package' covering one basic IVF cycle (excluding medications, embryo freezing, and ICSI) but states no dollar amounts publicly; patients are directed to billing personnel for itemized cost estimates. No numeric pricing was found on any official UT Health San Antonio web page.

Cycle characteristics

Retrievals with no eggs collected
11.6%
Cycles discontinued before transfer
11.2%
Cycles for fertility preservation
4.1%
Transfers using a gestational carrier
0.7%
Frozen embryo transfers
74.3%
Transfers using ICSI
57.0%
Transfers using PGT
34.2%

Services offered

  • Donor egg services
  • Donated embryo services
  • Gestational carrier services
  • Egg cryopreservation
  • Embryo cryopreservation
  • SART member clinic

Patient infertility causes (CDC reported)

Causes can overlap — patients may report more than one. Percentages do not sum to 100%.

Male factor
26%
Diminished ovarian reserve
21%
Tubal factor
20%
Unexplained
16%
Recurrent pregnancy loss
11%
Ovulatory dysfunction
10%
Endometriosis
8%
Uterine factor
6%
Other (infertility)
4%
Other (non-infertility)
1%

Insurance coverage in Texas

Texas has an IVF mandate (must offer). Read the full coverage rules →

Other clinics in Texas

See all Texas clinics →

Explore TreatCompare US

Texas IVF clinics
Compare all Texas clinics by success rate
Compare