Skip to main content

Obesity prevalence map: England 2024/25

65% of adults in England are overweight or obese — but that national average hides a 24.6-point gap between areas. This map shows the share of adults aged 18+ classified as overweight or obese across all 106 sub-ICB locations, from 54.4% in North Central London ICB - 93C to 79% in Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICB - 04Y.

England average
65%
adults 18+ overweight/obese
Highest area
79%
Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICB - 04Y
Lowest area
54.4%
North Central London ICB - 93C
Area-to-area gap
24.6 pts
across 106 areas

Where obesity is highest and lowest

Darker shading marks higher adult overweight and obesity prevalence. The pattern is broadly north-and-coast heavy: the North East, Yorkshire, the West Midlands and parts of the South West run hottest, while large parts of inner and outer London sit lowest.

% of adults 18+ classified overweight or obese (2024/25)
Under 60%60-64%64-68%68-72%72% and over
England average 65% · hover an area for detail · self-reported, age-standardised

Does obesity track deprivation?

Partly — but less than the headlines suggest. Across the 75 areas with matched IMD 2019 deprivation scores, the link is positive but modest (correlation r = 0.34). The most-deprived quarter of areas average 69.5% overweight or obese, against 65.2% in the least-deprived quarter — a real gap, but deprivation explains only a fraction of the area-to-area variation.

The clearest exception is London: several of its most income-deprived areas record England's lowest adult overweight rates, pulling the national correlation down. Population age structure is not the driver here — the underlying figures are age-standardised, so differences in how old each area is have already been removed.

NHS obesity-drug prescribing: a postcode lottery

NHS dispensing of obesity medicines (BNF section 4.5) broadly follows prevalence — higher-prevalence ICBs tend to prescribe more (r = 0.46 across 30 ICBs, to 2026-03). But the spread is enormous: Black Country dispenses 16.7 items per 1,000 patients, while Northamptonshire dispenses just 0.6 — a roughly 28-fold difference that prevalence alone cannot explain.

Because this counts NHS prescriptions only, it misses the large and growing volume of privately prescribed weight-loss medication — which is exactly where most people now obtain treatments like tirzepatide and semaglutide. A low NHS prescribing rate does not mean low local demand; it often means people are going private instead.

Integrated Care BoardOverweight/obeseNHS obesity-drug items / 1,000
Black Country71.2%16.7
South Yorkshire71%15.9
Staffordshire And Stoke-On-Trent69.8%14.5
Lincolnshire69.1%14.2
North East And North Cumbria69.9%13.5
Coventry And Warwickshire66.5%13.3
Cheshire And Merseyside67.5%13.3
Humber And North Yorkshire68%13.1
Lancashire And South Cumbria67.5%13
Birmingham And Solihull66.1%11.8
Greater Manchester66.3%11.7
Leicester, Leicestershire And Rutland65%10.8
Herefordshire And Worcestershire63.2%9.5
Cornwall And The Isles Of Scilly69%9.3
North East London61.2%9.1
Derby And Derbyshire67.6%8.3
West Yorkshire66.8%7.5
Dorset65.5%7.4
Kent And Medway66.6%7.3
Shropshire, Telford And Wrekin67%7.2
South West London56.5%7.2
Somerset68.4%7.1
South East London58.3%6.2
Devon64.3%5.9
Bath And North East Somerset, Swindon And Wiltshire62.3%5.7
Hampshire And Isle Of Wight63.9%5.1
Gloucestershire66.2%4.6
Bristol, North Somerset And South Gloucestershire61.4%4.3
Nottingham And Nottinghamshire68.5%2.4
Northamptonshire68%0.6

NHS dispensing, BNF section 4.5, items per 1,000 registered patients, 12 months to 2026-03. Source: OpenPrescribing.net. ICBs shown where a population denominator was available.

The affordability gap: where treatment costs the most income

Private weight-loss treatment is priced nationally, but incomes are not. Across UK providers, a typical mid-range maintenance dose of GLP-1 treatment runs roughly £219–£268 a month — on the order of £2,820 a year. Set that against disposable income per head and the burden falls hardest exactly where obesity is highest. In the North East — England's highest-prevalence region at 70.3% — a year of treatment equals 15.3% of per-head disposable income, against just 8.7% in London, the lowest-prevalence region. The same price is a 1.8× heavier load on the places with the greatest need.

RegionOverweight/obeseDisposable income / headA year of treatment
North East70.3%£18,38815.3% of income
Yorkshire and The Humber68.2%£19,24914.7% of income
West Midlands67.6%£19,48014.5% of income
North West67%£19,75214.3% of income
East Midlands67.5%£19,87914.2% of income
South West64.7%£22,61212.5% of income
East of England65.2%£23,66111.9% of income
South East63%£26,05810.8% of income
London57.4%£32,3308.7% of income

Income: ONS regional gross disposable household income (GDHI) per head, 2022. Treatment cost is a UK category figure based on published pharmacy list prices for a mid-range maintenance dose of GLP-1 weight-loss treatment (median across 33 UK providers, March 2026) — it is not a specific product, brand or provider price, and is shown only to express affordability as a share of income. “A year of treatment” = £2,820 as a percentage of per-head disposable income.

The affordability angle

Private weight-loss treatment is priced nationally — an online provider charges the same whether you live in the highest-prevalence area or the lowest. That means the places with the greatest need are often the least able to fund treatment privately when NHS access is limited. If you are weighing up your options, compare what UK providers actually charge for consultations and monitoring before you commit.

Compare UK weight-loss provider pricing →

Every area ranked (106 sub-ICB locations)

Adult overweight and obesity prevalence for 2024/25, highest to lowest, with each area's gap to the 65% England average.

#Sub-ICB locationOverweight/obesevs England
1Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICB - 04Y79%+14
2North East and North Cumbria ICB - 00P77%+12
3Cheshire and Merseyside ICB - 01J74.6%+9.6
4South Yorkshire ICB - 02P74.4%+9.4
5North East and North Cumbria ICB - 00N74.4%+9.4
6Humber and North Yorkshire ICB - 03K74.2%+9.2
7Greater Manchester ICB - 02H73.7%+8.7
8Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICB - 05W73.6%+8.6
9North East and North Cumbria ICB - 00L73.3%+8.3
10West Yorkshire ICB - 03R73.2%+8.2
11Cheshire and Merseyside ICB - 01F73.1%+8.1
12Cheshire and Merseyside ICB - 01T73%+8
13South Yorkshire ICB - 03L72.5%+7.5
14Nottingham and Nottinghamshire ICB - 02Q71.8%+6.8
15Cheshire and Merseyside ICB - 12F71.8%+6.8
16South Yorkshire ICB - 02X71.5%+6.5
17Mid and South Essex ICB - 07G71.3%+6.3
18Black Country ICB - D2P2L71.2%+6.2
19North East and North Cumbria ICB - 16C70.8%+5.8
20Mid and South Essex ICB - 99F70.7%+5.7
21Lancashire and South Cumbria ICB - 02G70.7%+5.7
22Lancashire and South Cumbria ICB - 00X70.6%+5.6
23Mid and South Essex ICB - 99E70.4%+5.4
24West Yorkshire ICB - 02T70.4%+5.4
25Humber and North Yorkshire ICB - 03H70.2%+5.2
26Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICB - 05D69.8%+4.8
27Humber and North Yorkshire ICB - 03F69.6%+4.6
28North East and North Cumbria ICB - 84H69.3%+4.3
29Lancashire and South Cumbria ICB - 01A69.1%+4.1
30Lincolnshire ICB - 71E69.1%+4.1
31Cornwall and The Isles Of Scilly ICB - 11N69%+4
32Greater Manchester ICB - 01Y68.8%+3.8
33Cheshire and Merseyside ICB - 01X68.6%+3.6
34Humber and North Yorkshire ICB - 02Y68.5%+3.5
35Somerset ICB - 11X68.4%+3.4
36Cheshire and Merseyside ICB - 01V68.4%+3.4
37Nottingham and Nottinghamshire ICB - 52R68.4%+3.4
38Lancashire and South Cumbria ICB - 02M68.3%+3.3
39Greater Manchester ICB - 01D68.1%+3.1
40Greater Manchester ICB - 00Y68.1%+3.1
41West Yorkshire ICB - X2C4Y68.1%+3.1
42Northamptonshire ICB - 78H68%+3
43Greater Manchester ICB - 00T67.9%+2.9
44Cheshire and Merseyside ICB - 99A67.9%+2.9
45Greater Manchester ICB - 01G67.9%+2.9
46Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland ICB - 04V67.9%+2.9
47Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes ICB - M1J4Y67.9%+2.9
48Lancashire and South Cumbria ICB - 00R67.8%+2.8
49North East and North Cumbria ICB - 13T67.8%+2.8
50Derby and Derbyshire ICB - 15M67.6%+2.6
51North East and North Cumbria ICB - 01H67.5%+2.5
52South Yorkshire ICB - 03N67.4%+2.4
53Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICB - 05Q67.2%+2.2
54Mid and South Essex ICB - 06Q67.1%+2.1
55Suffolk and North East Essex ICB - 06T67.1%+2.1
56Lancashire and South Cumbria ICB - 00Q67%+2
57Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland ICB - 03W67%+2
58Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin ICB - M2L0M67%+2
59Humber and North Yorkshire ICB - 03Q66.9%+1.9
60Kent and Medway ICB - 91Q66.6%+1.6
61Coventry and Warwickshire ICB - B2M3M66.5%+1.5
62Gloucestershire ICB - 11M66.2%+1.2
63Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICB - 05G66.1%+1.1
64Lancashire and South Cumbria ICB - 01E66.1%+1.1
65Birmingham and Solihull ICB - 15E66.1%+1.1
66Suffolk and North East Essex ICB - 07K65.9%+0.9
67Norfolk and Waveney ICB - 26A65.6%+0.6
68Dorset ICB - 11J65.5%+0.5
69Hampshire and Isle Of Wight ICB - 10R65.5%+0.5
70Greater Manchester ICB - 00V65.4%+0.4
71Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICB - 05V65.3%+0.3
72West Yorkshire ICB - 15F65%0
73Humber and North Yorkshire ICB - 42D64.9%-0.1
74Suffolk and North East Essex ICB - 06L64.8%-0.2
75Hertfordshire and West Essex ICB - 06K64.6%-0.4
76Hertfordshire and West Essex ICB - 07H64.4%-0.6
77Devon ICB - 15N64.3%-0.7
78West Yorkshire ICB - 36J64%-1
79Cheshire and Merseyside ICB - 27D64%-1
80Hampshire and Isle Of Wight ICB - D9Y0V63.7%-1.3
81Sussex ICB - 97R63.3%-1.7
82Greater Manchester ICB - 02A63.2%-1.8
83Herefordshire and Worcestershire ICB - 18C63.2%-1.8
84Sussex ICB - 70F*63.1%-1.9
85Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire and Berkshire West ICB - 14Y63%-2
86Bath and North East Somerset, Swindon and Wiltshire ICB - 92G62.3%-2.7
87Frimley ICB - D4U1Y62.3%-2.7
88Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland ICB - 04C61.8%-3.2
89Greater Manchester ICB - 01W61.8%-3.2
90Lancashire and South Cumbria ICB - 01K61.5%-3.5
91Cheshire and Merseyside ICB - 02E61.4%-3.6
92Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire ICB - 15C61.4%-3.6
93Hertfordshire and West Essex ICB - 06N61.2%-3.8
94North East London ICB - A3A8R61.2%-3.8
95North East and North Cumbria ICB - 99C61.1%-3.9
96Greater Manchester ICB - 14L60.9%-4.1
97Cambridgeshire and Peterborough ICB - 06H60.7%-4.3
98Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire and Berkshire West ICB - 15A60.3%-4.7
99Surrey Heartlands ICB - 92A*59.4%-5.6
100Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire and Berkshire West ICB - 10Q59.3%-5.7
101South East London ICB - 72Q58.3%-6.7
102Mid and South Essex ICB - 99G58.2%-6.8
103South West London ICB - 36L56.5%-8.5
104North West London ICB - W2U3Z56%-9
105Sussex ICB - 09D55.2%-9.8
106North Central London ICB - 93C54.4%-10.6

* Surrey Heartlands (92A) and Sussex (70F) sub-ICBs changed boundaries in 2023; the parent-ICB value is shown for continuity.

Methodology & caveats

  • Source: OHID Fingertips indicator 93088, “Overweight (including obesity) prevalence in adults”, derived from the Active Lives Adult Survey (Sport England), 2024/25.
  • Self-reported: height and weight are self-reported and statistically adjusted by OHID. They still tend to under-count true prevalence relative to the measured Health Survey for England, so read these as a conservative floor.
  • Age-standardised: figures are age-standardised, so area age structure has been removed — differences are not an artefact of some areas being older.
  • Geography: 106 sub-ICB locations on ONS SICBL July 2022 (ultra-generalised, clipped) boundaries. OHID publishes only a combined (Persons) figure at this level — sex breakdowns and the longer time series exist only at ICB, regional and England level.
  • Deprivation: IMD 2019 average scores, matched for 75 of the 106 areas (IMD predates the 2022 boundaries, so some areas are unmatched).
  • Prescribing: NHS dispensing of BNF section 4.5 obesity medicines via OpenPrescribing.net, items per 1,000 registered patients, 12 months to 2026-03. Excludes private prescriptions.

Frequently asked questions

What percentage of adults in England are overweight or obese?

In 2024/25, 65% of adults aged 18+ in England were classified as overweight or obese, based on OHID's processing of the Active Lives Adult Survey. Figures use adjusted self-reported height and weight and are age-standardised.

Which area of England has the highest obesity prevalence?

Among the 106 sub-ICB locations, Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICB - 04Y has the highest adult overweight or obese prevalence at 79%, while North Central London ICB - 93C has the lowest at 54.4% — a 24.6-point spread across England.

Is obesity higher in more deprived areas?

There is a positive but modest link: the most-deprived quarter of areas average 69.5% versus 65.2% in the least-deprived quarter (correlation r = 0.34). Deprivation explains only part of the variation — several deprived inner-London areas record England's lowest adult overweight rates.

Is private weight-loss treatment harder to afford in some regions?

Yes. Private GLP-1 weight-loss treatment is priced nationally — roughly £219–£268 a month — but disposable income varies sharply by region. A year of treatment equals about 15.3% of per-head disposable income in the North East, England's highest-prevalence region, versus 8.7% in London. The cost falls hardest where overweight and obesity are most common. (Cost is an illustrative category figure, not a brand or provider price.)

Is this measured or self-reported data?

It is self-reported height and weight from the Active Lives survey, statistically adjusted by OHID to better align with measured data. Self-reported figures still tend to understate true prevalence compared with the measured Health Survey for England, so treat these as a conservative floor.

Sources & further reading

Guides & articles

In-depth guides and cost breakdowns from the TreatCompare editorial team.